What is authentic assessment?
You probably have heard of the term authentic assessment before. Authentic assessment has been increasingly adopted in higher education, and is certainly proving its relevance and value to both educators and learners.
But what is it, and why should we care?
Svinicki (2004) offers the following definition of authentic assignments:
" Authentic assignments should be based on 'student activities that replicate real world performances as closely as possible'."
Examples of authentic assessment may include simulation, role-playing, case study, creation of different forms of media, e-portfolio, you name it. The authenticity of an assessment task may be determined based on the nature of your discipline, and how well it is contextualised to reflect real work scenarios in a particular industry.
So, you may be thinking, 'is traditional obsolete?', and 'is it even possible to make all assessment components authentic?'. Those are valid questions, and my answers are 'no', and 'probably not'.
Firstly, traditional assessment such as multiple-choice questions and essay writing are valuable in evaluating students' understanding of foundational concepts, and their critical thinking to some extent.
Secondly, given the constraints in time and resources, it is not likely that every assessment task could be authentic. Therefore, it is important to think about assessment in your unit as a portfolio of assessment, containing an appropriate balance of both traditional and authentic assignments.
Why authentic assessment?
Now, let's take a moment and reflect on our own work context. Despite the structure in place to establish our goals and ensure quality of our work, we are often given the autonomy to choose how we work, i.e. how we solve problems. We often need to provide direct evidence of our competence (performing a task), which is the essence of authentic assessment.
"Student learning experience and development is beyond the grade they get at the end of the subject."
(Frey, Schmitt & Allen, 2012)
Similarly, authentic assessment requires students to perform tasks and provide direct evidence of their competence. Furthermore, by allowing students some freedom in how they can demonstrate their competence in terms of skills and knowledge, you are effectively developing students for their ability to think critically and solve problems creatively. Students may also be enabled to collaborate with their peers and communicate their work with an audience other than their grader. These are the 4Cs of many frameworks on 21st century skills, which is gaining attention and sparking meaningful conversations in Higher Education about how we should prepare our students.
An example
Damien Lambert and his team teaching Auditing and Assurance has had a busy S2. The team have implemented storyboard and role-playing performances as parts of their assessment for their unit. Students first get to work in teams to come up with their own work scenario for auditors, and subsequently create a storyboard for submission. Finally, they get to act out their scene to an audience inclusive of fellow students and assessors.
Damien and his team are not the only ones in the Department of Accounting to adopt this form of assessment. In fact, other CEs teaching Auditing and Assurance including Ashna Prasad and Lisa Powell have also collaborated and shared knowledge to refine this form of assessment and make it work for their own cohorts. The three CEs were motivated to implement storyboard and role-play in an auditing course to develop students on creative thinking and effective communication skills. These are highly desirable attributes of auditors, and will enhance graduates' employability.
I have also had a chance to provide some feedback on the marking rubric for this assessment task and saw tremendous value added to students' learning experience. So last month, Kris Nagy and I paid a visit to one of Damien's role-play sessions. Without further ado, here are some of the highlights. Enjoy!
Students during their performances |
Two assessors discussing their results |
A closing thought
References
1. Svinicki, Marilla. (2005). Authentic assessment: Testing in reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2004. 23 - 29. 10.1002/tl.167.2. Battelle for Kids. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2019, from http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
3. Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 17(2).
4. Designing Authentic Assessments. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2019, from http://www.queensu.ca/teachingandlearning/modules/assessments/20_s2_12_designing_authentic_assessments.html
No comments:
Post a Comment